Friday 14 February 2014

“Just waiting for you to talk so that I can” – John Grant
Discussion, so it is said, is of key importance to the academic life. The debate, the flow of ideas, comparison and critique, amongst your peers, is the primary signifier of academia’s importance. Why then do so many academics sit through seminars with the single goal of waiting until they can talk themselves? Comments, less than the constructive development of ideas, are packing crates on which to stand and air one’s own agenda, ideas or approaches. This steering of discussion is not always done with malice: Often people are blinded by the narrative of their own publications and institutional years in defence of arguments. The ability to accept new approaches, or even opinions on old subjects, has been whittled down by the pugilistic stance that they themselves continue in seminars. Others are simply too tied up with their own egotistically driven focus to tear their minds away. At times such focus becomes so blinkered it is as if any divergence of thought away from their own interests would lead to feelings of insecurity that they normally equate to those who remain quiet.
All is not lost for the discussant. With careful balance of whit and respectful play to ego, the speaker can gain valuable reassurance that they have either covered the ground for critical responses, or at least have had their work reflected in the eye of someone else’s agenda: these can lead to valuable changes in perspective. The speaker’s expectation regarding the listeners is unlikely one of engagement with their topic, unless it suitably matches the schedule of those present: in which case the seminar is mere campaigning to those who are already signed-up. Rarely do you find the academic who sits and wonders ‘what is the speaker trying to say?’ - Instead they insist on focusing on correction: ‘What should they be saying?’. The performance of presenting amongst your peers requires skill in story telling: make sure that they sit comfortably, buff their ego cushions and speak softly; grasp their attention with something agreeable and lead them down the road of acceptability towards your slightly shocking, but now obvious, conclusion. Engagement is the key, will they ask questions that imply they have listened, will they want to clarify some aspects that appear vague or will their steel hard cage of academic institutional life keep the speakers own approach from truly being heard?
In this industry of knowledge manufacture and understanding there needs to be a greater focus on the power of iteration and failure. Standardised events for the display of framed arguments are illusions, hiding the real process that leads to the development of ideas. Within such power centred arenas the loudest voice is often the status quo and the new challenging developments can often be silenced with effort. Ideas, theories, approaches and methods all require a driving force to take them from inception to development and application. All great work requires commitment and defence for ‘there is no such thing as an immaculate conception’[1]; but when this industry is driven by the systemic defence of such psychologically embedded projects, how do you remain committed to one idea, without being in some way closed to new ones.



[1] Bourdieu I think…

Tuesday 11 February 2014

Raindrops: Sooner or later one will land somewhere interesting

Raindrops: Sooner or later one will land somewhere interesting

I grasp the bar of my bike with my elbow and settle into the rain seat. After many trial and errors I have managed to find a place to sit down during the one and a half hour journey from Canterbury back to London, whilst still keeping my bike close at hand (in case I drop off) and keeping it out of the way of the doors. It took me a while, but I got lucky in the end.
My eyes droop when someone grasps my attention…
“Can I ask mate… is that a road bike… you see I don’t get it. I have had many bike, I love ‘em, but mountain bikes and BMXs. So… your wheels are bigger…right?”. He stand up as he speaks and sits down in the seat in front of me.
“Er…yeah. They are thinner as well, less contact with the road. Less grip, more speed.” I cautiously say. I love my bike and would hate this to preclude them attempting to remove it from my possession. They nod, lifting their baseball cap of the top of their head showing spots and greasy hair, then replacing it, a reflexive gesture. He fidgets and seems a little uncertain how to respond, they kneel on the chair placing their hands on the back of the seat in front. Two things occur to me at that point: 1, they smell; 2, that it is in fact a woman, or at least a girl of around 16 or 17. Her baggy American style hoodie and ‘pants’ have hidden all sign of shape.
“Yeah…ok… so they are faster, but what about going on mud and downhill”. She constantly moves from knee to knee her hands touching her cap again, or sweeping limp hair from her face.
“Yeah… not so good at that. But I mostly ride on the roads so it’s ok.” I have given up all pretence at sleep. Yeah of commuting at all hours in London have taught me how to spot those people who need to talk, and talk she did.
“I don’t have a bike anymore, I did, but I sold it. Can’t remember what for. I’m just coming back from this team day thing that the councillor said I should go on. It’s all about confidence and that. There was this guy there, he couldn’t even talk and I told him to ‘Get off his ass and join in’. I mean, if I can do it, then he can right. You see my confidence is not that great, you know…. Where are you getting off?” It is like she is already judging the length of her story next to the train ride and wants to speed things along so she can fit it in.
“er… London.” Vague, but specific enough I hope.
“Yeah, right, I get off at Dartford, and we are passing the place where it happened. You can see it from the train. You see I saw a man get shot. Seriously… “ The pause is calculated effect, she wants me to react.
“Wow… what happened.” I admit, I am engaged. I want to know now who this person is and what happened.
“I was just there you know, I was just there on the high street and he was just there and this guy… he came out of the betting place and this other guy got out of a car and he kind of punched him… with a gun. I don’t remember the sound, but it must have gone off, there was so much blood. I remember the guy just shouted at him then got in the car and was gone. Everyone was just standing round like they was in shock or something, but I ran towards him and held him. I shouted for someone to call an ambulance. There was so much blood…” Still fidgeting, but more in the moment now, she takes her cap completely off and looks at it reassuringly, before returning it to her head.
“THERE” she stands up pointing out of the window and down into the street that the train crosses over. “That is where it happened, just there”. By the time I look I see shop fronts flash by before it’s is the train sidings again, all trees and discarded rubbish. She sits back down and fidgets a little.
“I had to go to court… I had to say what I had seen. They say that I am traumatised, suffering shock of the moment which is funny ‘cause I was the only one who did something – Ya’ know. I didn’t really think about it much later when I got my clothes back from the police. They still had blood on.” I’m shocked at that.
“What! They sent them back to you with blood on!?” It seems callous, thoughtless.
“Yeah… it was not until then that I cried. You know… properly balled, like when yer a kid. Thing is, I dunno. I not sure about God or nuthin’ but it was like it had to be me, you know. Like somehow I was there just to be with him, in that moment.” I nod and smile. I don’t know what to say – his isn’t about me anyway.
“It’s just… well… it could have happened to anyone. But it didn’t it happened to me. Why me?!” She keeps talking but my mind is racing, she mentions the course she is on and school, not wanting to live with her crazy mum and the problems she has with anger. I’m like a sponge now, trying to hold the moment all in. It is the perfect moment of research, like a pure interview without direction or impetuous from myself. I try and record the moment somehow, physically emulating my digital recorder in my bag…silent yet blinking.
“Anyway mate… this is my stop. Nice meeting you…”
“Yeah… safe journey.” I stare.
“Nice bike mate”.
“Thanks.” And she is gone. Those words replay in my head: ‘…it could have happened to anyone. But it didn’t it happened to me.’ All I can think of is that it did happen to anyone, and that anyone was her.

Inverted Pyramid Scam

This scam works in the same vein as the story above – for the single person it feels special, real, but seen in the context of the many it is pure luck. It is often reported as predicting the outcome of horse races, but has also been the focus of an ‘Alfred Hitchcock Presents’ feature named the Mail Order Prophet[1].
The process is simple, you choose some events in the future, horse races, political elections, lottery numbers etc. and you write a number of letters to cover all eventualities in the first event. For ease, let us assume there at five events, each with a 50/50 chance. The scam works by you writing a number of letters predicting the future – half with the one outcome, half with the other. The letter will state that you can predict the future and can prove it a number of times. Half the letters will be right and half will be wrong. On the next event you write to the half that received the ‘right’ letter and predict the next event; although half of your letters will be right and half will be wrong.  You repeat this as many times as necessarily until you have a small number of people who are convinced by your prowess at predicting the future. You would then ask them if they want to benefit on this and get them to send you money to gamble on your next prediction, one you do not even have to make.
This trick works because for the individual you have proof that accurate predictions have been made. Your understanding of the process is linear, in that it tracks only your ‘straight line’ path through your own personal history. It has no understand of the entire process but nonetheless it feels special, real.
This is the same process that has occurred at the market, many times people refer to the ‘core’ people or the ‘steadfast’ the ‘stalwarts’ of the market and give them something special, some important role in the construction of the market. In reality the market is just as much created through the loss of many individuals as it is through the mainstay of the select few. 



[1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0508320/combined